- Neuro & connectomics
NIH CONNECTS Mouse Connectome
Scaling circuit analysis and reconstruction
Sponsored programs at APL, and the tools and data they produced.
Funded by NIH, DARPA, IARPA, and DoD.
Scaling circuit analysis and reconstruction
Petabyte-scale data storage and community collaboration for connectomics and precision medicine
Community standards for high-resolution connectomics
Low-shot learning algorithms inspired by insect neural connectivity
Algorithms for cubic millimeter mammalian neuroscience; scene parsing methods for operator-focused environments
Reproducible cloud processing pipelines for neuroscience
Translating biological neural computation to next-generation ai algorithms
Quantitative measures of operator capability in complex operational contexts
Infrastructure, tools, and teaching artifacts — most open source, all built to be used by someone other than their author.
The Brain Observatory Storage Service and Database — petabyte-scale storage and delivery for volumetric neuroscience, serving the connectomics community as shared infrastructure.
A query language and engine for finding subgraph motifs in connectomes — ask structural questions of a brain network without writing a traversal.
Training and mentorship for nanoscale connectomics: ten technical units from electron-microscopy basics through NeuroAI analysis, a curated journal club, and hands-on work against real datasets including MICrONS and FlyWire. Built for three audiences at once — students, the mentors supporting them, and programs adopting the model.
An AI mentor working from an operational knowledge corpus — symptom to fault to corrective action, plus the tacit cues experts never write down — that probes a learner through a live scenario at a chosen level of expertise. It assesses on unfamiliar scenarios, because repeating a known pattern is not transfer.
Grades an argumentative essay twice — once from the finished text, once from the transcript of the AI dialogue behind it — and reports the gap between them. Every score is anchored to a verbatim quote, and criteria a model should not settle alone route to the instructor, whose override becomes calibration data.
Next-token prediction explained at five depths, so a reader can take the level they can actually use rather than the one the author found interesting. The build is written up beside it as a worked example of designing for a capability instead of for coverage.
A soap-bubble physics sandbox: shape a wand, watch the film billow and deform in moving air, then run the whole thing backwards — fit an ellipse to a photo of a real bubble and read the wind speed back out of the shape it left.
A shared reading list, tool directory, practice library, events calendar, and community roster for people doing learning engineering.
Open to sponsored research, consortium roles, and co-investigator work across connectomics, large-scale data infrastructure, and the measurement of human performance. Reach him at wgr@jhu.edu.